kareina: steatite vessel (2nd PhD)
I have signed up for a short course next month, which has an on-line component, and the course has a forum discussion section, with an "introduce yourself and your research section".  I posted a short intro of myself, which said:

*************************************
I doing a second PhD, half-time, and long distance, in Archaeology this time. My research is a provanancing study of Viking Age Swedish Steatite (soapstone).
 
I am a life-long non-traditional student.  I loves school so much, that when graduated high school (in 1984 in Alaska) I enrolled in the local "college" (as they call it in the states) with the goal of "being a student forever", and started taking a random assortment of classes because they sounded fun, and not aimed at any particular degree. Six years later a friend of mine was trying to decide which graduate school offering him money he was going to accept.  This was my first introduction to the fact that it was possible to get paid to be a student (I was the first person in my family to get a university education), and my goal suddenly changed from being a student forever, to being paid to be a student. The only problem was how to choose only one "major" field of study so that  could get the bachelor's degree needed to go on to be a graduate student?  There are so many interesting subjects...
 
I wound up choosing geology as my major because I enjoyed rock-climbing and loved mountains and wanted to know more about both.  This path led me to Oregon for the Bachelor's degree, back to Alaska for my Master's, and to Tasmania for my PhD. Years later I settled in Luleå Sweden, where I first did a post-doc in geology, and then, when that funding ran out became the laboratory for a Laser-ablation ICP-MS lab here.  Since that was a half-time position, and I have also always been interested in archaeology, when I saw the ad for a "geoarchaeology" half-time PhD position in Durham I applied, suggesting that I could use my laser lab for doing the analyses.  I was delighted to find out that once one has that first PhD it is possible to enrol in another without having really taken undergraduate classes in the new subject, at least if there is some overlap in the skill sets needed. 
*************************************

Which got a reply that said:

"Your research sounds super interesting! May I ask what caused you to decide to study soapstone? Did you have any particular encounters with it during your rockclimbing expeditions? Or did you perhaps encounter it in a museum, or was it a particular use the type of stone was used for that fascinated you? When you mentioned Viking Age, my mind immediately connected the era and stones to runestones. Was soapstone used for rune inscriptions?"

Having taken the time to answer her there, I thought I may as well share here, too, as someone else might be interested in the answers:

*************************************


Thanks, I am enjoying the research so far.  As to how I finally settled on soapstone, it wasn't easy. When I first saw the ad for the half-time PhD position I sent an email explaining that I was interested in aarchaeology, had a degree in geology, and a half-time job managing a LA-ICP-MS lab. I mentioned that I had read some papers that used Raman to measure composition in garnets in Merovingian jewelery to determine where the stones came from, and thus say something about trade routes, and that I would enjoy doing a similar project with my lab. This led to a number of different emails being exchanged back and forth, during which the list of potential projects just kept growing. However, it isn't feasible to do multiple projects on lots of different materials (the list included garnet, glass beads, spindle whorls, and many more), so we needed to narrow it down to just one. Therefore we switched to a skype conversation, and two hours later finally settled on soapstone, for a number of reasons:

  • While garnets are very near and dear to my heart (there is SO MUCH information recorded in garnet about the changes in temperature and pressure at which the mineral was growing, and garnet analysis was a big component of my first PhD research), and they appear often in lots of pretty objects from a variety of cultures, usually said objects are so nice I wasn't certain we could convince a museum to let us do laser-ablation on them, since it does leave a mark (unlike the Raman used in the articles I had mentioned)
  • Another mineral that featured in my PhD research, and in my first post doc, is talc, which is the main component of soapstone, and I am nearly as fond of it as garnet
  • Soapstone in the Viking Age was used for every-day household objects, including cooking pots, spindle whorls, and more. Being less fancy than jewelery, the odds of being permitted to actually analyze it goes up. It is also so soft that it is possible to leave a scratch mark on it with a finger nail, which means that the very minor damage left by a laser wouldn't really be noticeable in addition to all of the other wear and tear the object has received over the years.
  • In the course of the conversations and background reading I was doing I found out that the Vikings used soapstone, but not ceramics, for their cooking, with the result that in some places they settled where there had been a tradition of ceramics, the pottery shards completelydisappear from the archaeological record, only to re-appear after the Viking occupation of the area. Furthermore, it was so important to their lifestyle, they took it with them to their settlements which have no available soapstone quarries (like Iceland--it simply isn't possible, geologically speaking, to find soapstone on that island, other than what the people brought with them, and they did).
  • Finding out that it was so common to cook with made me realize that in all of my years of historical re-enactment camping events I had never once seen anyone cooking with a soapstone pot, and I wondered why not? (Though I did once see a flat piece of soapstone being used as a bakestone for flatbread cooked over an open fire. yum!)
I don't happen to know of any examples of soapstone being used as runestones off the top of my head. However, I do know of an example here in northern Sweden of a soapstone cliff face which has rock art dating back to the the stone age, and continuing off an on over time, including Viking age drawings of ships, right up to modern graffiti. (To be fair I didn't know about that one till I stumbled upon the paper about it, after I started this project.) However, I do know of a runic inscription on a spindle-world that is in the collection of the Swedish Historical Museum.
*************************************
kareina: (BSE garnet)
From [livejournal.com profile] broider_barones

1. Would you like to reign again? What was the most fulfilling part of reigning?

Yes, I think that it has been enough years now that I would like to reign again. I was so very young and new to the SCA when I served as 2nd Princess of Oertha that I didn’t really know what I was doing, and couldn’t properly appreciate it. I think I now have sufficient experience to more fully embrace the role. Which is funny, because for most of my time in the SCA I’ve had a champion carrying my favour in tournaments, yet I didn’t really want us to be granted victory—I was simply content with getting (or giving when it was me in armour) the salutes before each round of combat. Now that I feel confidant enough to seriously consider it I not only have no one carrying my favour, but I’m not even eligible to enter in my Kingdom of residence as I’ve not yet attended enough in-Kingdom events to meet the minimum qualifications. Therefore it isn’t going to happen any time soon!

It is hard to say what the most fulling part of reigning is—it has been so many years that my memories of being princess are a bit spotty. But I will never, ever forget the joy that came from making Kylson and Anne a Viscount and Viscountess, nor will I ever forget the tears in Kylson’s eyes when we gave him a Leaf.

2. Other than fiber and dance - what hobby do you like to spend time doing?

I love my daily yoga practice—it feels so good to move and to stretch. And there is something so very joyful from the balancing poses; knowing I can do a head-stand is an amazing confidence-booster! I love hiking and long walks. I really enjoy climbing, too, but haven’t made time for that one if far, far too long. My other weakness is reading. When I was young it was always SciFi/Fantasy books. These days LiveJournal, FaceBook, and blogs compete with fiction for my reading time.

3. What would be your ideal job?

One where they pay me to learn interesting things and have fun doing field work in the mountains and then play with fancy high-tech equipment to analyse the samples afterwards. One where I get to set my own hours and choose my own research topics. Plus or minus teaching. Yup, I like academia.

4. You could only go to/stay in 1 country for the rest of your life. Which one would it be?

I am so not a monogamist! But if you are going to remove everywhere else from the map I guess I’ll choose Norway, as it has a very good mountain to flat land ratio, is far enough north to have good weather, the vegetation is “right” to my Alaskan eyes, and they speak a language which is high on the list of languages I wish to learn. They are, sadly, lacking in an SCA branch, but I’m willing to play some other re-enactment game if I must (since the SCA would cease to exist when the other countries vanished anyway). Food might be an issue though, since I think a reasonable amount of food there needs to be imported, and if the other countries vanished, where would it come from?

5. Why garnets?

1. They are pretty!
2. They are very common in a wide range of metamorphic rock types
3. They are stable across a reasonably broad range of pressures and temperatures of relevance for metamorphism
4. The often form “porphyroblasts” (crystals that are noticeably larger than those which surround them)
5. They are easy to identify in hand-samples—their nice “garnet-red” colour often contrasts with the other minerals in the sample
6. They are easy to identify in thin-section—they have a high “relief” (they look like they are taller than the things next to them, even though they aren’t) and they are isotropic (they are black when the polarizing filters are crossed, no matter how the stage is turned, making them stand out against the bright blues, pinks, and yellows that the other minerals turn when the filters are crossed)
7. They have a rather broad range of possible chemical compositions, with iron, magnesium, manganese, and calcium all fitting into the same position in the crystal structure (this is part of what gives it a broad range of stable temperatures and pressures) and aluminum and silica can do a certain amount of swapping one for the other as well. There are a handful of other, less common elements which can also substitute for others in its crystal structure.
8. They have very slow diffusion, which means that once they reach a certain size the center of the grains no longer get involved in chemical reactions. As a result it is normal for the composition of garnets to be “zoned”, with the center containing more Mn than the rims, and the rims containing more Mg than the core (each of the other major elements also typically change their concentration from core to rim).

We metamorphic petrologist talk about the garnet cores being “armored” by the rims. The rims are, in theory, in equilibrium with the matrix minerals at any given time—this means that the minerals present will be participating in the chemical reactions that are causing the growth of some minerals and the dissolution of others. For many minerals the normal grain size is small enough that the reactions involve the entire grains, but garnets often grow large enough that only the outermost shell is involved in the reactions, with the inner portion “freezing” in whatever composition was stable when it was the outer portion.

So, just like an EverlastingGobstopper (do they still make those candies?) changes colors as you suck on it, so garnets show a range of compositions from core to rim. Part of the changes in garnet composition are due to rare ingredients having been used up making garnet (plus or minus any other zoned minerals present). So Mn, which tends to prefer garnet to any other mineral in metamorphic rocks, starts out “high” in garnet, but there is usually so little of it available in any given metamorphic rock it is soon used up and the garnets have gradually less and less Mn as they grow, until eventually the outer portions have no measurable Mn at all. The other reasons garnets change their composition is due to changes in pressure or temperature. Different recipes of garnet are stable at different pressures and temperatures. So if the conditions change different types of garnet grow on the outside of the pre-existing garnet. These features all combine to make it a very well-studied mineral because of all of the information one can extract about the history of the rock.

Note: today's icon is a Back-scatter Electron Image (BSE) of a garnet. It is a grain about 2 mm in diameter.
With BSE images the heavier the elements present the brighter the image, and the lighter the elements present the darker the image. The contrast for this image has been adjusted to make the garnet (which contains the reasonably heavy elements of Fe, Mg, and Mn) grey and the quartz (which contains only silica and oxygen) black. The two bright white patches are inclusion of monazite--a mineral which contains the even heavier elements of uranium, thorium, and lead (which the first two radioactive elements decay to). The pattern of black dots in the garnet are inclusions of quartz which got trapped inside of the garnet as it grew. The fact that there is ab obvious ring of quartz around the middle tells us that there was a noticeable change in the rate of garnet growth between the core and the rim. Indeed, when one looks at the composition changes of the garnet itself, there is a huge change in composition of the garnet which correspond to the change in the inclusion density.
kareina: (BSE garnet)
From [livejournal.com profile] broider_barones

1. Would you like to reign again? What was the most fulfilling part of reigning?

Yes, I think that it has been enough years now that I would like to reign again. I was so very young and new to the SCA when I served as 2nd Princess of Oertha that I didn’t really know what I was doing, and couldn’t properly appreciate it. I think I now have sufficient experience to more fully embrace the role. Which is funny, because for most of my time in the SCA I’ve had a champion carrying my favour in tournaments, yet I didn’t really want us to be granted victory—I was simply content with getting (or giving when it was me in armour) the salutes before each round of combat. Now that I feel confidant enough to seriously consider it I not only have no one carrying my favour, but I’m not even eligible to enter in my Kingdom of residence as I’ve not yet attended enough in-Kingdom events to meet the minimum qualifications. Therefore it isn’t going to happen any time soon!

It is hard to say what the most fulling part of reigning is—it has been so many years that my memories of being princess are a bit spotty. But I will never, ever forget the joy that came from making Kylson and Anne a Viscount and Viscountess, nor will I ever forget the tears in Kylson’s eyes when we gave him a Leaf.

2. Other than fiber and dance - what hobby do you like to spend time doing?

I love my daily yoga practice—it feels so good to move and to stretch. And there is something so very joyful from the balancing poses; knowing I can do a head-stand is an amazing confidence-booster! I love hiking and long walks. I really enjoy climbing, too, but haven’t made time for that one if far, far too long. My other weakness is reading. When I was young it was always SciFi/Fantasy books. These days LiveJournal, FaceBook, and blogs compete with fiction for my reading time.

3. What would be your ideal job?

One where they pay me to learn interesting things and have fun doing field work in the mountains and then play with fancy high-tech equipment to analyse the samples afterwards. One where I get to set my own hours and choose my own research topics. Plus or minus teaching. Yup, I like academia.

4. You could only go to/stay in 1 country for the rest of your life. Which one would it be?

I am so not a monogamist! But if you are going to remove everywhere else from the map I guess I’ll choose Norway, as it has a very good mountain to flat land ratio, is far enough north to have good weather, the vegetation is “right” to my Alaskan eyes, and they speak a language which is high on the list of languages I wish to learn. They are, sadly, lacking in an SCA branch, but I’m willing to play some other re-enactment game if I must (since the SCA would cease to exist when the other countries vanished anyway). Food might be an issue though, since I think a reasonable amount of food there needs to be imported, and if the other countries vanished, where would it come from?

5. Why garnets?

1. They are pretty!
2. They are very common in a wide range of metamorphic rock types
3. They are stable across a reasonably broad range of pressures and temperatures of relevance for metamorphism
4. The often form “porphyroblasts” (crystals that are noticeably larger than those which surround them)
5. They are easy to identify in hand-samples—their nice “garnet-red” colour often contrasts with the other minerals in the sample
6. They are easy to identify in thin-section—they have a high “relief” (they look like they are taller than the things next to them, even though they aren’t) and they are isotropic (they are black when the polarizing filters are crossed, no matter how the stage is turned, making them stand out against the bright blues, pinks, and yellows that the other minerals turn when the filters are crossed)
7. They have a rather broad range of possible chemical compositions, with iron, magnesium, manganese, and calcium all fitting into the same position in the crystal structure (this is part of what gives it a broad range of stable temperatures and pressures) and aluminum and silica can do a certain amount of swapping one for the other as well. There are a handful of other, less common elements which can also substitute for others in its crystal structure.
8. They have very slow diffusion, which means that once they reach a certain size the center of the grains no longer get involved in chemical reactions. As a result it is normal for the composition of garnets to be “zoned”, with the center containing more Mn than the rims, and the rims containing more Mg than the core (each of the other major elements also typically change their concentration from core to rim).

We metamorphic petrologist talk about the garnet cores being “armored” by the rims. The rims are, in theory, in equilibrium with the matrix minerals at any given time—this means that the minerals present will be participating in the chemical reactions that are causing the growth of some minerals and the dissolution of others. For many minerals the normal grain size is small enough that the reactions involve the entire grains, but garnets often grow large enough that only the outermost shell is involved in the reactions, with the inner portion “freezing” in whatever composition was stable when it was the outer portion.

So, just like an EverlastingGobstopper (do they still make those candies?) changes colors as you suck on it, so garnets show a range of compositions from core to rim. Part of the changes in garnet composition are due to rare ingredients having been used up making garnet (plus or minus any other zoned minerals present). So Mn, which tends to prefer garnet to any other mineral in metamorphic rocks, starts out “high” in garnet, but there is usually so little of it available in any given metamorphic rock it is soon used up and the garnets have gradually less and less Mn as they grow, until eventually the outer portions have no measurable Mn at all. The other reasons garnets change their composition is due to changes in pressure or temperature. Different recipes of garnet are stable at different pressures and temperatures. So if the conditions change different types of garnet grow on the outside of the pre-existing garnet. These features all combine to make it a very well-studied mineral because of all of the information one can extract about the history of the rock.

Note: today's icon is a Back-scatter Electron Image (BSE) of a garnet. It is a grain about 2 mm in diameter.
With BSE images the heavier the elements present the brighter the image, and the lighter the elements present the darker the image. The contrast for this image has been adjusted to make the garnet (which contains the reasonably heavy elements of Fe, Mg, and Mn) grey and the quartz (which contains only silica and oxygen) black. The two bright white patches are inclusion of monazite--a mineral which contains the even heavier elements of uranium, thorium, and lead (which the first two radioactive elements decay to). The pattern of black dots in the garnet are inclusions of quartz which got trapped inside of the garnet as it grew. The fact that there is ab obvious ring of quartz around the middle tells us that there was a noticeable change in the rate of garnet growth between the core and the rim. Indeed, when one looks at the composition changes of the garnet itself, there is a huge change in composition of the garnet which correspond to the change in the inclusion density.

Profile

kareina: (Default)
kareina

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags