kareina: (stitched)
I know full well that one of the most useful things I can say to someone after reading (or hearing) something that provokes a strong emotional response in me is something along the lines of "Give me a minute--I am having a strong emotional respons to what I heard(read). Let me process this a bit, and then we can talk about it and try to determine if what you thought you said and what I thought I heard have anything to do with one another".

Yet even so, I was foolish enough to let my fingers start typing some of the free-associated thoughts that spilled forth along with the emotions. Not in a nice, safe Word document that only I would see, no--I typed them in a FB chat window, with the "press enter to send" button activated.

This foolishness on my part resulted in unedited, unconsidered, raw-emotion bearing thoughts getting abruptly, and unexpectedly, sent, mid-sentence, to another human being, for which I am deeply apologetic.

I share the fact that I made this mistake today publicly as a reminder to myself that I know better, and to be more courteous the next time I feel such a reaction to something I hear. If any who reads these words happen to learn from my mistake without the bother of making it yourself, then that is a bonus side effect.
kareina: (Default)
Progress report: This weekend I discovered that my packing brain should not have been permitted to go any where near my uni work. I ran one final experiment in December, and analysed on 21 Dec, just before finishing up packing all of my possessions to go into storage. On the day I did the analysis I recorded that the smaller of the two capsules, which has no garnet in it, was the NM composition. The other capsule contained anthophyllite. Every other sample which contains anthophyllite is the NP composition. This weekend I finally sat down to do the last of the data processing for that sample and discovered that when I converted the sample names from the codes of "small" and "large" to actually showing the "NM" and "NP" labels I somehow did it backwards, and said that the one without garnet was NP and the one with anthophyllite was NM. Ooops.

Of course I discovered this error when it was time to get ready to head out the door to gaming on Saturday. Gaming was followed by a 1.5 hour drive to [livejournal.com profile] archinonlive's brother's house for the brother's wife's birthday. This was the last of his siblings I've met, and I am please to report that I like all of them. They are all intelligent, articulate people who carry on interesting conversations in fluent English.

Sunday was folk dancing, and much fun as always, so I didn't get around to fixing the above mentioned error till today. But it is now fixed (after triple checking that it was, in fact an error) and I am ready to move on to the next step in actually getting this research turned into a paper.

Today I accomplished laundry, uni work, and tonight was the other folk dancing class, and was also much fun. Afterwards I read another couple of pages in the Swedish Children's book we are working on. My pronunciation is getting better, but still needs much help.

Tomorrow I have uni work to do, and Swedish language class to attend, and in the evening choir practice. No wonder I'm not posting as often as I used to do...

Profile

kareina: (Default)
kareina

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718 19 20 21
22 2324 25 26 27 28
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags