kareina: (me)
Some of you may recall my mentioning that one is meant to obtain a local driving licence within one year of moving to Sweden. I was so busy and so enjoying life that 20 months slipped by before I actually really started the process of obtaining a local licence. Since I have 30 years (it still boggles my mind that it has been that long!) driving experience I decided that it would be a good idea to actually take some lessons with a driving instructor, so as to learn which bad habits I have that could interfere with passing a driving test on the first try, and how to get over them. I already knew, from having had to take the driving test twice in Australia, that when I learned the part about how engaging the clutch before stepping on the break can prevent sliding on the ice in winter, I learned it too well, and that my normal driving method of stepping first on the clutch and then the break, and holding the clutch in from then on till time to go again was NOT considered ok by modern driving examiners, and I thought it would be nice to try to unlearn that habit, and instead learn the pattern of down shifting and engine breaking that is recommended today.

But life is busy, and while I took a couple of lessons back then, that was October, and in November we bought a house, so I didn't book another till March, when I realized that it really has been too long since moving here, and I *need* to get that licence. Not that I drive if I can possibly talk someone else into it, but sometimes I am the only one available.

In May I finally figured out how to get to the part of the driving school's web page wherein one can look at questions which are "like the ones on the real theory test", and, every so often I would go there and play with it. The more I did this, the more concerned I became for the written part of the test. I know I passed the Alaskan written test on the first try, and found it easy, and I don't recall if I even bothered to read a book before passing the Australian written test on the first try (even though it took two tries for the driving test there due, primarily, to the aforementioned clutch issue), but these questions alternated between easy and HARD. Many of the most difficult ones were things I didn't recall being addressed in the book (which I read cover to cover once before trying the web page) and which I couldn't find addressed in the book through use of index and table of contents (e.g. how many of every ten pedestrians struck by a car driving 30 km/hr are killed?). Others were difficult because I couldn't understand the explanation in the book (e.g. here is a picture of registration for a car and for a trailer. Which level of licence do you need to have to pull the trailer with this car? The way to calculate the answer from the numbers on these forms seems to be more complicated than it needs to be, since it is necessary that the trailer count as "light" if one has only a B (normal) licence, and "light" depends on several factors).

Needless to say, those problem questions were starting to worry me. Especially when the web page abruptly changed its layout and I could no longer find the practice questions I had been working with, and instead could only find practice exams. The first section I had played with was a set of 700 some odd questions presented in multiple choice format, and once you answered one you could push a button and it would reveal if you got it right or wrong. If wrong you could return to the question the next day (or later), when it would show you what you had last guessed, and you could pick another answer, and then it would tell you if that one was right or wrong. Since most questions don't have more than four answers to choose from, in theory, one could work out the correct answer to all of them in four days of hard work.

However, I was doing these in the late evenings, after the rest of my work for the day was done, and so I didn't ever have the energy to go through all 700 questions, even though I would always go back and fix the ones I had guessed wrong on the day before. I had planned to go through the full set, and then go back and read them again to learn them all, but, as I mentioned above, one day, well before achieving this goal, the web page changed, and I couldn't find that section anymore. Instead what I found were practice exams, which used the same questions (and corresponding photos) as that set I had been working my way through. The practice exams were set up to be as much like the real test as possible--sets of 70 questions to go through, 50 minutes to do it in, and no finding out which were right or wrong till after you answer them all and push the "score test button" (of course, one could push that button before answering all of them, but it gives an "are you sure?" message, since you will get wrong any left unanswered).

Since I had already seen a number of the questions from the practice sessions I had done I found some parts of those tests easy--I knew the answer from having guessed wrong previously, but, sadly, every practice test also had questions I had never seen before. Some of them were easy (what does this sign mean?) and others are hard (also "what does this sign mean?", but instead of the primary meaning, they list only other, incidental, minor implications that are not explicitly mentioned in the book on Swedish road signs). As a result, as I worked my way through the stack of practice tests I nearly always needed to take each one twice before I was able pass it, and sometimes it took three tries. This was NOT good for my ego!

I have always been a good test taker and learn quickly, and have a good memory for things I have read, so it was frustrating to be getting things wrong because I had never been exposed to the information and was reduced to guessing. I eventually reconciled myself to trying to think of it not as practice tests, but rather someone trying to teach via the Socratic method, but not doing the best job of it. Or, perhaps the method was working on me--since the tests appear be generated by a semi-random selection of questions from a common pool many of the same questions came up over and over again, and the one I missed before I generally got right every time thereafter.

Since I was booked to take the written test today I have been putting more and more time into these practice tests over the past week or two. I worked my way through the first four sections, then through "repetition one", then through "end test", but still the section "repetition 2" wasn't clickable, so I started on the section below called "Osedda frågor", but I didn't think about what that title might mean, till I clicked on it a second time and got an error message explaining that it wasn't possible to generate me another such test as I have already seen all the questions. There you go "osedda" = unseen. New word for the day.

Not surprisingly, at that point the practice tests started to get easier for me, and I even managed to get 100% correct several times in a row on the "road markings" specific test.

Then, last night, I accidentally stumbled on another section of the web page, where I found that original section in which I had been working--where I found out that I had only managed some 300 odd of the 700+ set. So I started going through that again, and really appreciated the instant feedback. However, as I was scheduled for the real test this morning, that didn't leave much time for trying again on the ones I got wrong, since it sill won't let one try again till the next day. Not that there were so many of these--since I have seen all the questions by now I was mostly getting them correct, but, occasionally on a hard one I didn't remember what the right answer was.

So, this morning [livejournal.com profile] lord_kjar's alarm went off the first time at 05:30, since he needs many repeats of the snooze button before he will actually get up in the morning, and I had one last driving lesson scheduled for 07:30 before my written test at 08:45 (it was the only time this week they had any openings, and they strongly recommend taking a couple of lessons the week one takes the test). Since I wake up much easier than he does I did my morning situps and got out of bed straight away, and took my breakfast to the computer, where I happily told the web page the correct answers to the questions I had missed yesterday and then worked my way through more questions till he was finally up and ready to go.

Today's driving lesson was all in Swedish. I had previously had lessons from the two men who work at the driving school, both of whom are fluent in English, but this week the woman instructor was the only one available, and she is not fluent in English, and, indeed, is reluctant to even try. But my Swedish has become quite usable recently, so I did fine--it is easy to understand "rakt fram", "svang till hoger", & svang till vänster". In addition, much to my delight, in addition to that, we also conversed a little. I was able to tell her how long I have lived in Sweden, where I work, what I do there, etc., and she told me that she grew up in Luleå, etc.

After the lesson they dropped me off at trafikverket, where I found out that in Sweden the test is done quite differently than in the US or Australia. In the other countries the test was done on an individual basis--one comes in, checks in (pays the fee), is sent to a computer where one takes the test, and one leaves when one is done without it mattering if there is anyone else who also wants to take the test or not. Here in Sweden one pays (on line) weeks before the test, and on the day one checks in, shows one's ID and is sent to sit in the waiting room, with lots of other people. Then, once everyone has checked in they call everyone into a room at once, where we turn in our ID cards and are each sent to a specific, numbered, computer, where we log in with our personal identification numbers and all take the test at once.

The test itself consists of 70 questions, of which 65 actually count (the other five are questions they are testing to see if they want to include them in the real test at some point in the future), and there is never any way to find out which five didn't count. Of the 65 real questions one must answer at least 52 of them correctly. Since I knew that I haven't really been able to spare the time I have been making for all of the practice questions (getting further and further behind where I want to be for work), it was very important to me that I pass this test on the first try. Therefore I resolved to not only read each question carefully, but on every case where I wasn't *certain* of the correct answer I would mark the question so I could go back and look at it again after I had answered everything.

I completed my first go through with 33 minutes still available on the clock and pushed the button to see the list of questions and how many I had marked. Fourteen!?! That is a scary number of "not certain"s on a test where one is only free to get 8 wrong (ok, 13 if all five of the "don't counts" happen to be in that pile). So I went through them again and determined that for all 14 questions the question mostly addressed points that had NOT been covered on any of the practice questions I had seen (e.g. into which of these four circled places in this engine does one put the oil?).

I went back through those 14 questions three different times before finally deciding that, nope, I really don't know which answer they want in most cases (few I was able to figure out the right answer by looking again at the photos), and no amount of looking again is going to help, so I finally pushed the "grade it" button, with 18 minutes still to spare of the 50 available. Let me tell you, pushing that button was probably the scariest thing I have done in a long, long time. It certainly raised my stress levels enough to feel the tension and other physiological reactions in my body. And oh, the relief I felt when, a split second later, it told me I had passed! I answered 60 of the 65 questions correctly (and will never know how I did on the other five, which don't count).

The computer gave me the option to see which ones I got wrong--they flashed each of them on the screen for 10 seconds, with my incorrect answer still marked, but no indication of what the correct answer was. Much to my surprise, four of them were from that pile of 14 uncertain questions, and one was one I thought I had had correct. however, I no longer recall what it was. The only one I am certain I got wrong now was the above mentioned "where does the oil go?" question, and I knew I had a 50% chance on that one, since two of the circled reservoirs were white plastic and had a pale liquid in them, so were certainly not oil, so that left only two options. When I got home I compared our engine with the one in the photo, and it looks nothing like it--the one I should have guessed in the photo was an opening smack in the middle top of a huge black object which dominates the engine compartment, and in our car the huge black engine dominating object does not have an opening set into the top of it--instead the oil goes into a separate opening off to the side. I can live with missing this one!

After I got out of the test it was 09:41, so I started walking along the bike path homeward ([livejournal.com profile] lord_kjar had driven me in this morning, since I am not yet legal to drive on my own). About half way to uni I ran into a colleague, who had been out for a jog, but stopped to cool off with a quick dip in the lake, and had just left the water as I passed the beach. I like living in a town small enough that these things happen. I reached the uni around 10:44, and [livejournal.com profile] lord_kjar, who had been working across the street from my office today, was about to go home for lunch, so I rode with him the last four km. Since then all I have accomplished is a lovely lunch, a short nap, and typing this, so I had better close here and do some uni work. While I count taking the test as uni work, since I sometimes have to drive for work, it is not the sort that gets the project any closer to done...
kareina: (me)
When we purchased our house back in November it came with an old front loading washing machine, and, out in the shed, another similar one that they said is "for parts". The washer worked well enough that we have been using it, but some months back something changed such that it was no longer possible to open the door by pushing the door-opening button. Instead we have needed to insert a small screwdriver through a narrow slot in the machine and push up to get the door to pop open. Sometimes this works on the first try, others it takes a few minutes of fussing with it to get the angle spot on such that the door opens. Oddly enough, the process did not become easier over time--whether it worked straight away, or after much fussing always seemed to be random.

In addition to the door issues the noise the machine made when spinning has recently started to become very loud. Like loud enough that even I (with my hearing problem) sometimes noticed it while I was upstairs (it is in the basement), and [livejournal.com profile] lord_kjar commented that the sound indicates that something is NOT right with the machine, and assures me that it didn't sound like that when we moved in. He is quite good at fixing stuff, and we have both been wanting him to fix it for a while, but other things have been higher on the priority list, and the machine was still cleaning the clothes, so we have been putting that project off.

This morning I commented that it is frustrating that so many things on the list are things that I need his help with to do (or things that he just plain needs to do) and I listed the washer as one of the examples. I commented that it would be nice if I could just do some of them on my own if he were busy with something else. He said I should go for it with the washer, so downstairs I went.

First I took off the back, and, much to my surprise, it was no where near as dusty/dirty back there as I expected. However, other than being cleaner than I would have expected, there isn't much to see in that part of the machine--the belt that attaches the motor to the machine was visible, and when I tried moving it the belt moved smoothly. So I did a quick clean of such dust was in that part, and then went and asked him what I should do next, since I couldn't tell what might be the problem.

He came down and looked, and when he moved the belt he pointed out the sound that indicated that the bearings were in bad shape. Sound. Others tell me it is so useful, but I would never have noticed that sound, had he not insisted it was relevant.

Since he was downstairs we then both set to work opening up the rest of the machine, which was every bit as dirty inside as I had expected, so I happily set to cleaning the insides while he continued to open up new areas.

Eventually, I had most internal surfaces cleaned, and he had finally opened up enough that we could reach the mechanism that controls the door opening (which is, of course, in the hardest part of the machine to access). Once he could see it it commented that there should be something connecting this part with that part, so I looked down to the corner bottom of the machine under where the mechanism is, where I hadn't yet gotten in to clean, and, sure enough, I could see a small metal rod and a small washer shaped thing down there, in the dust. It turns out that my arm is *just* skinny enough to reach in there to clean out that dust and rescue those parts--no way could he have gotten his arm in there.

Once we pulled the pieces out it was easy to see where the one had broken off from the main mechanism, which explained why the door no longer opened when we pushed that button. So we went out to the shed, to look at the parts washer. Someone had removed the engine from that one at some point before we bought the house, and it was sitting on a shelf near the machine. He picked it up, and spun the rod in it, and determined that it didn't make any bad-bearings noises. Therefore we put forth the hypothesis that the reason it was out was that at some point in the past someone had already swapped the engine from the one into the other, and this one had something else wrong with it other than bearings.

Then we opened up the parts machine, and found that the door opening mechanism was still intact, so we removed it, and brought both it and the spare engine into the house. Then we swapped out the door opening mechanism with the good one, and put back together most of the machine (doing some last few bits of cleaning as we went). After that we took both engines into the shop, where he opened them up and confirmed that yes, one of the cases of bearings in the engine we have been using sounds very, very bad, but both of them in the other engine sound fine. So he swapped over the rod and bearings into the one we have been using (since there may be something wrong with the rest of the other one) and he put it back together. Then I put back together the spare one, and am confidant that I could have assembled the good one, too.

Then it was a simple matter to put back the engine, turn the electricity back on, and test the machine, which now works fine--no more unpleasant sound, and the clothes are quite clean. Best of all, the door opens when I push the button!

Why, yes, I do lead an exciting life, why do you ask?

In other news, I finished reading the Swedish translation of the Hobbit a week or so ago, and have just started reading the Swedish translation of the Clan of the Cave Bear. I am now 44 pages in, and am delighted to report that I am understanding nearly all of it. This probably reflects more upon how many times I have read that book in English over the years than it does my ability to understand Swedish, but it feels good nonetheless.

The plan for this week includes taking the test for a Swedish driving licence. This is something I should have done the first year I was in Sweden, but I have been busy and haven't gotten to it. I don't need to drive often, but it is now well enough past the one year one can drive on a foreign licence that I am not driving at all, so it will be good to get that done. I sure hope that I manage to pass the test on the first try. The practice test on the web page is full of difficult questions on topics the learn to drive book doesn't actually cover (e.g. what % of pedestrians are killed if they are hit by a car going 50 kph?). I don't remember the test in Alaska (which I took more than 30 years ago!) being that hard, and in Australia I passed the written test on the first try, and I don't recall even reading the book. Perhaps this is why they won't let me just trade in my licence, but require that I take the test.

Another reason I am looking forward to getting my licence is that the new, improved, spelling of my name has gone through, so that will give me an ID with the correct name on it. Ok, I already have a Uni ID card with the correct spelling of my name, since I got that on Friday.

Profile

kareina: (Default)
kareina

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678 910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags