how best to organize the summary?
May. 5th, 2009 05:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Ok, oh great LJ hive mind, I need to do a summary of all of my thesis results for the final chapter before going on to say what they all mean. I can think of ever so many ways to organize this information. I’ve got six different regions for which data has been acquired, two with lots of data, and information in every category, four with only a little data, and only covering some categories of information (and not necessarily the same categories). The categories include:
*Timing of peak metamorphism from monazite dating
*Timing of other episodes of monazite growth, which may or may not be related to metamorphism of the rocks the minerals are in at the moment
*differences in the chemical composition of the monazite of different ages, and what we can infer about the pressure/temperature at which it grew, and what other minerals would have been growing at the same time (and so competing for specific elements)
* timing of zircon growth (for only two samples) and how it relates to the monazite results
*pressure and temperature calculated for the conditions at which the garnet cores started growing
*pressure and temperature calculated for the “peak metamorphism” e.g. when the garnet rims finished growing
*pressure and/or temperature inferred from compositional trends in the minerals, but not calculated due to missing information (much broader guess-based information than the numbers of the two above)
*some structural information of folding within the sample which may relate to one or more of the deformations associated with the above times/pressures/temperatures.
The thesis itself is organized with three regional chapters (one each for the two main regions, and one for all of the other regions for which there is less data) covering all of the P/T results and one chapter talking about all of the timing/monazite/zircon results.
For the final Discussion and Conclusion chapter, am I better off echoing that layout:
Region 1 results
Garnet core conditions
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Region 2 results
Garnet core conditions
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Other regions results (repeat times three)
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Timing results
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Or, would it be better to keep it by region, but include the timing information in each region rather than keeping it separate from the temperature and pressure? Or, would it be better to discuss each topic (garnet core formation conditions, peak metamorphic conditions, other information) on its own, and address each region under those headings? Or is there an even better organizational system of which I’ve not yet thought?
Thanks for any suggestions you may have, my clock is ticking, the end of the month, by which the thesis needs to be complete, printed, bound, and submitted, is drawing nigh…
*Timing of peak metamorphism from monazite dating
*Timing of other episodes of monazite growth, which may or may not be related to metamorphism of the rocks the minerals are in at the moment
*differences in the chemical composition of the monazite of different ages, and what we can infer about the pressure/temperature at which it grew, and what other minerals would have been growing at the same time (and so competing for specific elements)
* timing of zircon growth (for only two samples) and how it relates to the monazite results
*pressure and temperature calculated for the conditions at which the garnet cores started growing
*pressure and temperature calculated for the “peak metamorphism” e.g. when the garnet rims finished growing
*pressure and/or temperature inferred from compositional trends in the minerals, but not calculated due to missing information (much broader guess-based information than the numbers of the two above)
*some structural information of folding within the sample which may relate to one or more of the deformations associated with the above times/pressures/temperatures.
The thesis itself is organized with three regional chapters (one each for the two main regions, and one for all of the other regions for which there is less data) covering all of the P/T results and one chapter talking about all of the timing/monazite/zircon results.
For the final Discussion and Conclusion chapter, am I better off echoing that layout:
Region 1 results
Garnet core conditions
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Region 2 results
Garnet core conditions
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Other regions results (repeat times three)
Garnet rim conditions
Other information revealed in mineral chemistry/structure of rock
Timing results
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Or, would it be better to keep it by region, but include the timing information in each region rather than keeping it separate from the temperature and pressure? Or, would it be better to discuss each topic (garnet core formation conditions, peak metamorphic conditions, other information) on its own, and address each region under those headings? Or is there an even better organizational system of which I’ve not yet thought?
Thanks for any suggestions you may have, my clock is ticking, the end of the month, by which the thesis needs to be complete, printed, bound, and submitted, is drawing nigh…